This is the mail archive of the firstname.lastname@example.org
mailing list for the Cygwin project. See the Cygwin
home page for more information.
Re: B20: mv deletes files on error (NT)
- To: email@example.com, cygwin users <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: B20: mv deletes files on error (NT)
- From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <email@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 18:48:11 -0500
At 03:24 PM 3/29/99 -0800, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>--- "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Is there any other point that's been missed?
>Can you think of others besides mv? cp is out of the running as you can't copy
>a file ontop of itself and in win32 foo and Foo are the same file.
>-- email@example.com --
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Well, let's flip the question. Why is it not adequate to modify "ln" to
handle the issue of hard links? This is not without precedent since it had
to be done at one time for file systems that don't support hard links (like
Whether or not foo and Foo are the same file, I see no reason why one can't
rename it in a case-sensitive manner. I can in the Explorer. I can using
DOS commands (like MOVE). Why shouldn't I be able to keep doing this in
Cygwin? Why does the change to support hard links necessitate a change in
Cygwin where support for "mv" does not? Mind you, I'm not arguing that
the support for hard links is bad but merely that the change made to support
them may not be the best approach to getting them! Is there anyone who can
clarify that point? The rest is just opinion, which while great for
discussion, usually wears thin after a time.
Larry Hall firstname.lastname@example.org
RFK Partners, Inc. (781) 239-1053
8 Grove Street (781) 239-1655
Wellesley, MA, 02482-7797 http://www.rfk.com
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to email@example.com