This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: size_of_stack_reserve SEGV
On Sat, Jul 31, 1999 at 02:00:25AM +0200, Heribert Dahms wrote:
>exactly like under Unix?
>Does "gdb foo core" work now as expected?
I didn't say to do 'gdb foo core'. I said:
"Run. Your. Program."
That would be:
Got it? It's really really simple.
>Bye, Heribert (email@example.com)
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Chris Faylor [SMTP:firstname.lastname@example.org]
>> Sent: Friday, July 30, 1999 00:21
>> To: Christoph Kukulies
>> Cc: email@example.com
>> Subject: Re: size_of_stack_reserve SEGV
>> On Thu, Jul 29, 1999 at 07:17:58PM +0200, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
>> >I compiled flex.exe and generated a lexer. (I'm just mentioning
>> >because (f)lex needs much stack often.)
>> >My lexer (which runs fine under unix) dumps core under NT (4.0),
>> >Cygwin B.20.
>> >I skimmed the FAQ for the work _size_of_stack to no avail.
>> Run. Your. Program. Under. GDB. Just. Like. You. Would.
>> Under. UNIX. If. You. Had. A. Similar. Problem.
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org