This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: select() implementation question
- To: cygwin at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: select() implementation question
- From: Chris Faylor <cgf at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 14:34:03 -0400
- References: <LOBBKDBPKEGJJFKNFHKBOECADEAA.email@example.com>
- Reply-To: cygwin at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
select() on a socket uses the winsock version of select it does not
establish connections, AFAIK.
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 08:32:20PM +0200, Boris Schäling wrote:
>FOURTH TRY! After changing the sender address my mail was caught by ORBS.
>Argh! Programming cygwin is much easier than sending a message to the
>mailing list ...
>> This is my third attempt to mail to the Cygwin mailing list. I
>> didn't see my previous mails before so I hope you don't see
>> several copies of this mail.
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: Boris [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
>> > > Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2000 1:44 AM
>> > > To: email@example.com
>> > > Subject: select() implementation question
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > If I open a port for listening and then call select() an
>> > > additional port is opened. Is this true? And whenever select()
>> > > returns it seems that several connections between random ports
>> > > are established? I hope this is select() - otherwise it must be a
>> > > bug in my application?
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org