Re: two differents version of unctrl.h, one in cygwin-1.1.7 and one in ncurses-5.2

[Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd at yahoo dot com>]

Mumit Khan wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> > In this case, I'm not sure exactly why newlib has a unctrl.h file, though.
> > I'm willing to use the ncurses version instead if that is the consensus.
> > The ncurses layout on my linux system seems to be different than cygwin
> > though so I don't see a clear correspondence.
> 
> Newlib has a bunch of stuff thrown in that may be there just for
> historical reasons, or to support certain targets. I don't see any
> other reason for newlib to contain unctrl. I have yet to see a non-
> curses program include unctrl.h, but of course someone must've done
> it for it to be included in newlib. Is there a problem in ncurses
> one overwriting the newlib one? I can't see it offhand, but that's
> untested.
> 

The problem will be the other way 'round.  If there is a new release of
the Cygwin runtime it will overlay the header from ncurses.

Cheers,
Earnie.

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple