Re: Available for test: gcc-2.95.2-7 - libstdc++.a

[Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>]

On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 01:12:54PM +0100, Tilman Utz wrote:
>Mumit Khan schrieb:
>>>And I was wondering why it was not included...
>>
>>Because the issue is coming up only now, and thanks to this discussion,
>>there maybe a solution in future releases.
>
>That'll be really good, because, IMHO only Mumit's headers and libs
>make the -mno-cygwin flag a useful option.

I'm still not clear on what these "headers" are.  Are they different
from cygwin's mingw package?  I thought that Earnie was keeping this
up-to-date.

Just to make things clear: I have very little interest in the
-mno-cygwin option to gcc.  I'm a Cygwin engineering manager and
developer not a No-Cygwin engineering manager and developer.  I've put a
not-insubstantial amount of time into getting things set up so that they
are beginning to work with -mno-cygwin but I am getting rather tired of
having to worry about this.

I am, as always, waiting for someone to step up and offer actual stuff
here.  The "Yeah, this will be great!" messages are pretty much white
noise at this point.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple