This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: no more package moratorium?
> > > What about existing packages? Specifically, it would be grand if
> > > tetex-beta would either get fixed or removed.
> >
> > IMO, any "released" tagged package should have it's maintainer, who
> > decides and tracks done error and bugs. So in ER specification we have
> > a [package] n <-> 1 [maintainer] relation.
>
> We have that, it's just recorded in the list archives :}. And hopefully
> soon to be recorded in setup.hint. IMO this should not be recorded
> separately from the package metadata (setup.hint).
why? if the metadata is held in a database and all setup.hints are
generated out of it we have no problems about consistence?!
Stipe
tolj@wapme-systems.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299
E-Mail: info@wapme-systems.de
Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
wapme.net - wherever you are
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/