This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [ANN][RFC] cygipc-1.11 at cygutils
- From: Jason Tishler <jason at tishler dot net>
- To: Charles Wilson <cwilson at ece dot gatech dot edu>
- Cc: Horak Daniel <horak at sit dot plzen-city dot cz>, cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 07:49:33 -0500
- Subject: Re: [ANN][RFC] cygipc-1.11 at cygutils
Chuck,
[Sorry for the sluggish response time...]
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 12:41:04PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Horak Daniel wrote:
>
> > > What does postgresql do if there is no system-wide union semun?
> >
> > There is a check for union semun in configure and then if it does not
> > find a system wide union semun it defines its own as
> >
> > [snip]
> Ah, then cygipc-1.11 won't work for postgresql. Cygwin (and Linux)
> implementations of IPC need a fourth union memeber,
> [snip]
> This sounds like a vote for 'return to 1.10 behavior'. Any other comments?
I just tried the simplistic approach: configure, make, make check.
PostgreSQL 7.1.3 builds cleanly and passes all regression tests. So it
seems that cygipc 1.11 is still compatible with PostgreSQL.
Thanks,
Jason
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/