This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
-mno-cygwin with newer GCC?
- From: "David Abrahams" <david dot abrahams at rcn dot com>
- To: <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- Cc: "David Abrahams" <david dot abrahams at rcn dot com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 13:41:05 -0500
- Subject: -mno-cygwin with newer GCC?
- Reply-to: "David Abrahams" <david dot abrahams at rcn dot com>
------
Request: If you can remember to, please reply to me personally in addition
to sending your reply to the cygwin list. Thanks!
------
Hi,
I'm trying to use -mno-cygwin with a Cygwin GCC-3.0.2 that I built from
sources. It seems that there are some preprocessor symbol definitions
missing, for example:
_U=01 _L=02 _N=04 _S=010 _P=020 _C=040 _X=0100 _B=0200 // for ctype_base
_GLIBCPP_HAVE_MBSTATE_T
it gets the wrong definition of
_GLIBCPP_HAVE_ACOSF
et. al. from std_cmath.
Is there a way to make this work?
It seems to me that the MINGW community (and Cygwin for that matter) is
pretty committed to gcc-2.95.x, but I want the improved C++ compiler
available with 3.0.2. Is anyone out there doing a similar thing, or am I
completely out on a limb?
TIA,
Dave
===================================================
David Abrahams, C++ library designer for hire
resume: http://users.rcn.com/abrahams/resume.html
C++ Booster (http://www.boost.org)
email: david.abrahams@rcn.com
===================================================
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/