This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [ECOS] Multi-ICE support Status
- From: Jonathan Larmour <jlarmour at redhat dot com>
- To: benny at voicepump dot com
- Cc: ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com, cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 17:58:59 +0100
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] Multi-ICE support Status
- Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd.
- References: <OMEPJJGAMLFGHOOCIGBCCEJACJAA.benny5@mindspring.com>
benny wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
> I followed the nice instructions on
> http://sources.redhat.com/ecos/multi-ice.html
> and all was fine till the last stage when the linker complained on two
> missed symbols in
> ARM library toolconf:
>
> gcc -g -O2 -o multi-ice-gdb-server.exe -Wl,--subsystem,console
> server-main.o r
> di150-low.o remote-utils.o utils.o server-win.o arm-singlestep.o
> MICE-gdbserverr
> es.o -L../../libiberty -liberty -lshell32 -ladvapi32 -lgdi32 -luser32 -L/cyg
> driv
> e/C/Multi-ICE/libraries -L/tmp/migdb/build/gdb/multi-ice -ltoolconf
> /cygdrive/C/Multi-ICE/libraries/toolconf.lib(toolconf.obj.b)(.text+0x25):..\
> ..\t
> oolconf.c: undefined reference to `_imp___isctype'
> /cygdrive/C/Multi-ICE/libraries/toolconf.lib(toolconf.obj.b)(.text+0x2f):..\
> ..\t
> oolconf.c: undefined reference to `_imp___pctype'
>
> Any ideas what library is missing (looks like something from Visual C?)
Actually it looks like something from Cygwin.
Cygwin guys, can you help on this? What has changed that has caused
libraries to stop being binary compatible?
Jifl
--
Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062
--[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
--[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]-- Opinions==mine
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/