Re: "Reply-To'' Munging Considered Harmful

[Robert Collins <rbcollins at cygwin dot com>]

On Sun, 2002-08-04 at 11:28, Samuel wrote:
> In the "Reply-To:" munging article that Randall referred to that is at:
> 
> <http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html>
> 
> it says:
> 
>     they haven't bothered to learn to use the ``reply-to-group'' feature of
> their mailer
> 
> Is that implying that the reply-to-group feature should work for mailing
> lists?

Yes, but when reading that article, please remember that the author is
focused on unix mail clients, which tend to be more feature rich (IMO)
that win32 mail clients - particularly MS ones.

Rob

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part