This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
RE: Missed patch? (gettimeofday time travels V2)
- From: "Fish" <fish at infidels dot org>
- To: <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 18:46:31 -0800
- Subject: RE: Missed patch? (gettimeofday time travels V2)
- Keywords: fish
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 09:55:15PM -0800, Fish wrote:
> >
> >Is there any reason why Philip Aston's 6 Jul 2002 patch to
> >gettimeofday et. al. logic to correct for WM_POWERBROADCAST events
> >(PBT_APMRESUMESUSPEND, PBT_APMRESUMEAUTOMATIC,
> >PBT_APMRESUMECRITICAL) hasn't made it into the sources yet?
> >
> >http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-05/msg00962.html
> >
> >Was this perhaps just a simple oversight? Or was there another
> >reason for it not being applied?
>
> Perhaps it would be instructive if you read the whole thread.
Perhaps I already did.
Perhaps it doesn't explain what is meant by "sacrific[ing] accuracy
for precision", nor precisely WHY "QueryPerformance* functions [is]
bad news", nor cite the vague "various references" mentioned.
AND PERHAPS you could just answer my question or perhaps point me to
a different thread instead (that perhaps DOES have the answers I
seek) instead of wasting my others' time with such unhelpful replies.
Do you think perhaps that is possible?
Or is that perhaps asking too much?
- --
"Fish" (David B. Trout)
fish@infidels.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.4
iQA/AwUBPiTLhkj11/TE7j4qEQLVBwCdFFe/nmRUBU9AcrAOtwI4oeH4pqsAoLdR
qQYOSaG9Dra0JgJLC31AR12D
=StPp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/