This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
RE: ls Question + bug?
- From: "Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail)" <garbage_collector at telia dot com>
- To: "Thorsten Kampe" <thorsten at thorstenkampe dot de>, <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 11:30:55 +0200
- Subject: RE: ls Question + bug?
> From: cygwin-owner at cygwin dot com [mailto:cygwin-owner at cygwin dot com]On Behalf
> Of Thorsten Kampe
> > NOTE: Do NOT change "/bin/ls" into just "ls",
> "command ls"
Ahh... there you are ;-)
> > Really soon -> a dead computer. (Powercycling is all that works
> after that)
> Your computer cannot be more dead than Windows 98 already is. Using an
> Operating System would you give something like "maximum recursion
> limit exceeded".
;-) as I see it any MS generated "OS" has strange limitations/obscurities,
the above is an obvious one in W98.
Remember where it all began; "Quick And Dirty Dos" -> very few changes ->
"MS-DOS 1.0". IMO the sense of it is still there, even in NT. Can't tell
about XP - but I would be surprised if the changes were that many.
I've been running _well known_ applications on NT that misbehaved every
Sad but true, the availability of software is too good. An old machine as
it is - sets limits that I do not want to step beyond... "That's why the
lady is a tramp" ;-) .
/Hannu E K Nevalainen, Mariefred, Sweden
--END OF MESSAGE--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html