Re: Cygwin survey: Next vim version with perl support?

[andrew brian clegg <a dot clegg at mail dot cryst dot bbk dot ac dot uk>]

Are there any editors available as binary distributions compiled with the 
-mno-holywars switch?

;-)

Andrew.

On Thu, 1 May 2003, Gareth Pearce wrote:

> Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 01:08:10 +1000
> From: Gareth Pearce <tilps@hotmail.com>
> To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Subject: Re: Cygwin survey: Next vim version with perl support?
> 
> > (*) Personally, I think perl support in vim would be nice, but I'm
> > absolutely against adding a perl dependence to the vim package.  There's
> > no reason to drag in yet another 6.5M of stuff if all I want is an editor.
> > If that were desirable, I'd just install emacs.
> 
> if 'all i want is an editor' then why get vim at all.
> ;)
> 
> Gareth - no bias here, move along, nothing to see.
> 
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> 


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/