This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: How does the windows specific aspects of nice work?
- From: Igor Pechtchanski <pechtcha at cs dot nyu dot edu>
- To: Jason House <jhouse at mitre dot org>
- Cc: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 13:33:59 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: How does the windows specific aspects of nice work?
- References: <3F79B817.email@example.com>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Jason House wrote:
> I did a search online and found the following message (but no reply to
> it). Does anyone know the particulars about nice? If it still works as
> they describe (with 2 non-normal priorities), does anyone know when it
> will allow the full range of window supported priorities?
> * From: "Thomas Chadwick" <j_tetazoo at hotmail dot com>
> * To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
> * Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 14:44:37 -0500
> * Subject: nice command?
> * Bcc:
> I got to playing around with Windows 2000 Task Manager the other day and
> discovered that you can change the priority of a running task. This led
> me to discover that you can specify the priority of a task when you
> launch it by way of the windows start command using one of the following
> LOW Start application in the IDLE priority class
> NORMAL Start application in the NORMAL priority class
> HIGH Start application in the HIGH priority class
> REALTIME Start application in the REALTIME priority class
> ABOVENORMAL Start application in the ABOVENORMAL priority class
> BELOWNORMAL Start application in the BELOWNORMAL priority class
> WAIT Start application and wait for it to terminate
> I then got to playing with nice (under Cygwin) to see what I could do
> about setting the priority of a Cygwin task. I used the following syntax
> and tried a number of values of x:
> nice -n x programname.exe
> I found that specify a value of x=0 results in NORMAL priority. For any
> value of x > 0, I found I got a priority of LOW. For any value of x < 0,
> I found I got a priority of HIGH.
> I tried "man nice" and "info nice" and got scant documentation. I'm just
> curious if this is the expected behavior of nice? Is my analysis
> correct, or are there other values of "x" that will get me the other
> Windows priorities? FWIW, there's a Cygwin task I'd like to launch with
> AboveNormal priority.
I suspect it's a <http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PTC> situation... The
implementation of the "nice()" syscall simply doesn't know about the
AboveNormal priority value (see winsup/cygwin/syscalls.cc:2512). There is
a more fine-grained control mechanism in the "sched_setparam()" Cygwin API
call, but the "nice" program doesn't use it.
P.S. Another thing that's missing is a "renice" program. Also PTC.
|\ _,,,---,,_ firstname.lastname@example.org
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ email@example.com
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster." -- Patrick Naughton
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html