This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Snapshot 20040225: make hangs/errors out
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 15:47:52 -0500
- Subject: Re: Snapshot 20040225: make hangs/errors out
- References: <c1j55u$kah$1@sea.gmane.org> <403E07A4.1010309@scytek.de> <20040226150318.GC23139@redhat.com> <403E1400.7010704@scytek.de> <20040226163404.GA25941@redhat.com> <403E245F.40101@scytek.de> <403E72B7.9050305@scytek.de> <403FD3AC.7010300@scytek.de> <c205f3$jel$1@sea.gmane.org> <4044E025.2060501@scytek.de>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 02:27:33PM -0500, Volker Quetschke wrote:
>>I can reproduce with that snapshot, but I get slightly different
>>results. Here is the stderr output from 1052 runs, but the strange
>>thing is that even when I get errors, the task continues to run. It
>>seems somehow that the return code of the errored run gets lost or
>>something.
>
>Are you still using this script:
>
>export C=1 while strace -o strace.$C.txt make -j ; do C=$(($C+1)) ;
>done echo Failed after $C runs
>
>If yes: The strace catches the errors. I use a script without strace
>and the while catches the error of the make command.
Do you actually have an strace which demonstrates the problem? I
don't any indication that you've duplicated this problem running
strace with a "modern" snapshot.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/