Re: echo vs. ls race condition?

[ht at inf dot ed dot ac dot uk (Henry S. Thompson)]

"Hannu E K Nevalainen" <garbage_collector@telia.com> writes:

>> From: Henry S. Thompson
>> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 6:32 PM
>
>> Fred Kulack <kulack@we.bigblue.xxx> writes:
>>
>> >> Short summary:  a loop with echo and ls does not produce well-ordered
>> >> output
>> >

<snip/>

> FWIW; I can reproduce it. It seems to me that it is some kind of problem
> with bash's use of subshells in loops (synchronizing output). I have no
> knowledge of the internals here, so bear with me.

That sounds plausible, but I too am incompetent to delve much
deeper. . .  There's the old issue of process id re-use, perhaps?

Thanks for trying it, and simplifying.

ht
-- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/