This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Why umount -A is a really bad idea
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 10:18:26 -0400
- Subject: Re: Why umount -A is a really bad idea
- References: <412CFBCB.3040808@breame.com> <20040825210724.GG29527@mikee.ath.cx> <Pine.GSO.4.61.0408251750380.6014@slinky.cs.nyu.edu> <412DC006.8090907@x-ray.at> <23bcb8700408260629433c7dbd@mail.gmail.com> <20040826161917.GA3327@coe.casa.cgf.cx> <41370D67.9010705@chameleonnet.co.uk>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 01:09:11PM +0100, Colin JN Breame wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>>I have had a modification to mount waiting in the wings for a while now
>>which foregos the use of the registry entirely but I can't convince
>>myself that, if I implement it, the mailing list won't be filled with
>>the moans of people who now have to do a "mount -a -t ntfs" (or
>>whatever) every time they reboot.
>>
>Any chance I can get a copy of this patch?
Sorry, no. I tend to avoid releasing unfinished things.
When I'm ready to release patches they go into cvs. The one in question
has undoubtedly suffered bit rot as I haven't looked at it in many
months. It is not 100% complete, either.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/