Re: hyperthreading fix try #2

[Rolf Campbell <thats dot unpossible at gmail dot com>]

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I'm not claiming that it is right now.  I haven't tried a "make -j" test
> yet.  I just thought it was time to release another try on the world
> again:
>
> http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
>
> To help preserve my tenuous grasp on sanity, please reply to *this
> thread* when reporting problems.  Please don't start a new thread.  Just
> reply here so that mailing list threading is preserved and I can easily
> check for all success or error reports.  As before, any kind of report
> is welcome but it is unlikely that I'm going to spend a lot of time
> debugging problems that I can't reproduce.
>
> cgf

My "make -j" test has been running for a while with no failures, and 
beyond that, this seems to fix a long-standing problem for me having to 
do with more excessive parallelization "make -j100" issues.

-Rolf


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/