This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: maintaining bash
David Dindorp wrote:
> Uhm. No it's not..
> Bash 2.05b is so unstable under Cygwin that it classifies as a
> volatile chemical. At least if you put it under a lot of pressure -
> a normal users everyday use it may cope fine with, which is probably
> how it's used by most people in here anyway.
> To be fair, this is probably more a Cygwin DLL problem than a bash
> problem, or perhaps a "bash hasn't kept up with changes in Cygwin
> because the maintainer haven't had the time" problem. It's running
> quite stable under 1.5.10, it sucks with 1.5.12 and 1.5.13 and any
> of the latest snapshots.. (Haven't tried 1.5.11, but I will as soon
> as I get the time.)
I would say it's probably got to do more with changes in the cygwin DLL
than bash. There's the PID reuse issue that has a workaround in the -17
package by Pierre's patch, and the // thing that Corinna mentioned.
Other than that I'm not aware of any reported bugs that have been
attributed to bash and not the DLL. I was basing my comment on what
others that know more about it than I have said in the past:
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html