This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
- From: "Karl M" <karlm30 at hotmail dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 06:57:25 -0700
- Subject: RE: OLOCA
And then once each year, we can have a big awards dinner in Boston for the
best acronyms in each of several categories.
From: "Dave Korn"
Subject: RE: OLOCA
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 14:19:15 +0100
>From: Igor Pechtchanski
>Sent: 31 May 2005 20:34
> On Tue, 31 May 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 02:08:22PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>>> On Tue, 31 May 2005, Dave Korn wrote:
>>>> ----Original Message----
>>>>> From: Igor Pechtchanski
>>>>> Sent: 31 May 2005 18:44
>>>>> Quoting from the bottom of the OLOCA:
>>>> Maybe you should move that bit up to the top?
>>> I doubt it matters where it is. That's the only place on the page
>>> says to send suggestions to the main Cygwin list. The words *on one
>>> the Cygwin lists* are *in the same sentense*. That should suffice,
>>>> And perhaps you should make the "*on one of the Cygwin lists*" text
>>>> bit bigger and more eye-catching.
>>>> Like about 36 miles on a side and bright pink and flashing, for
>>> I'll leave that to script kiddies. A couple more inquiries like that,
>>> though, and I'll consider making that bit bold...
>> I think we need an acronym to describe the problem:
>> Only Acronyms Used In Cygwin Lists
> Agreed, except that "Only Acronyms Used In The Cygwin Lists Should Be
> Suggested" lends itself better to prononciation:
> (Wow tickles bs)... Comments?
How about OSCA: Only Specifically Cygwin Acronyms ?
Wow, the Cygwin night at the OSCAs.
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html