This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Serious performance problems (malloc related?)
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Robb, Sam wrote:
Is there any reason why the cygwin DLL couldn't be built
twice: once for Win9x, and once for WinNT-based systems?
Aside from potential installation issues ("install this
version of the DLL under 9x, that version under NT), it
seems like this would be a reasonable optimization.
As long as we're mulling over ideas...
Alternatively, we could drop Win98 support.
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html