This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: setup.exe: feature request with patch

On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Dr. F. Lee wrote:

Hi All,

I deploy cygwin using unattended ( and wpkg
( It's useful for me to be able to specify additional
packages to be installed on the command line. The attached file is a patch to
provide this: call "setup -p package1,package2,package3,...,packageN" to have
packages1-N artificially included in the 'Base' part of the distribution and
hence automatically included.

No doubt there are many better ways of doing this (I'm not a C++ programmer
and had to go with 'what I could do' rather than 'the best way') but perhaps
this will be useful.


First off, thanks for the patch -- it's always nice seeing someone
actually try to solve the problem himself, whatever the eventual outcome.
However, patches to setup should generally be sent to cygwin-apps (you'd
have to subscribe).  FWIW, I've looked at the patch, and it seems to be
doing what it promises to do (with two minor nits: the global
packages_option seems superfluous, since you don't need to use it outside
of, and there is probably no reason to make a distinction
on whether something was added via the command line or the user's
selection)...  Further discussion of this should happen on cygwin-apps.

But, more importantly, you don't have to do *any* C++ programming at all
to achieve what you want.  Simply set up a local package server with one
empty package, which is in Base and "requires:" all the packages you need
installed.  But I agree that a command-line approach might be more
comfortable in some cases.
     |\      _,,,---,,_ |
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		Igor Peshansky, Ph.D. (name changed!)
    |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		old name: Igor Pechtchanski
   '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"Las! je suis sot... -Mais non, tu ne l'es pas, puisque tu t'en rends compte."
"But no -- you are no fool; you call yourself a fool, there's proof enough in
that!" -- Rostand, "Cyrano de Bergerac"

Unsubscribe info:
Problem reports:

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]