This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: missing definition of __STRING macro in standard cygwin headers
Pedro Alves wrote:
> It wouldn't work.
> #define __STRING #x != #define __STRING(x) #x
I am just quoting what the OP said, which was:
> What the web link basically says that cygwin doesn't have
> #define __STRING #x
> defined in any of the standard header files which means some source code
I have no idea what this code actually does with the define, having
never looked at it.
Brian
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/