This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Supporting Data Types "ushort_t" and "uchar_t"
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Larry Adams wrote:
> My concern is that the "*_t" typedefs are supposed to be hardware architecture
> agnostic, and there must have been some reason, other than "geeze everything
> else is that way, so why not do those two" to have done this for Solaris.
An understandable concern, though I'm having trouble imagining any
scenario where a sensible definition of "ushort_t" and "uchar_t" would
be anything other than "unsigned short" and "unsigned char".
Mark J. Reed <email@example.com>
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple