This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: orpie setup.hint problem
- From: Andrew Schulman <schulman dot andrew at epamail dot epa dot gov>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:26:48 -0500
- Subject: Re: orpie setup.hint problem
- References: <4B576D1F.9090906@acm.org>
> The requires: line for orpie mentions lapack. I think this should be
> liblapack0?
Hm, you seem to be right. I just uninstalled lapack and liblapack, leaving
just liblapack-devel and liblapack0. I quit and restarted orpie, and it
runs fine. (If you try to start orpie without any *lapack* packages
installed, it just gives a black screen.) It seems to use just
cygblas-0.dll, from liblapack0.
> For some reason, setup never believes that lapack is installed. It keeps
> listing it for installation in the Preview pane. I install it each time,
> but it is never listed as an installed package by cygcheck. orpie is the
> only package that depends on lapack.
Yes, lapack, gcc, and I think one other package do that. It's been
discussed here before but I forget the reason. It seems to be
uncorrectable at present.
I agree that it would be nicer to avoid that, so I'll post a new setup.hint
that fixes the dependency.
Thanks for reporting this.
Andrew.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple