This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: what's the problem of my cygwin installation?

On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 10:53:00AM -0500, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote:
>Christopher Faylor sent the following at Friday, February 05, 2010 9:59 AM
>>On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 03:08:59PM +0000, Dave Korn wrote:
>>>On 05/02/2010 11:58, G.W.  Haywood wrote:
>>>>It's long seemed to me that there's a case for changing the name of
>>>>this file.  On the average Windows box it is not unusual to see several
>>>>files called 'setup.exe' descended from entirely unrelated products.
>>>The Cygwin icon is a bit of a dead giveaway.
>>And, how, exactly, would changing the name of setup.exe to something
>>else cause a DECREASE in traffic?  It seems like the opposite would be
>>true.  We'd have to set up a new
>>"" list.
>Actually, for a while I've thought that a name change might be useful.
>The icon identifies it in the GUI, but not on the command line.
>I seem to remember having sometimes being blocked from doing something
>with a file named setup.exe.  I wasn't blocked after I changed the name
>or find some other way to do whatever I was trying to do with it.
>(Though maybe it was with a different "setup.exe".)

Your experiences notwithstanding, obviously thousands of people are
running setup.exe without problem.  Changing the name would throw a
large group of people into confusion.

We're not going to change the name.  I think the cost outweighs any
benefit (and I actually don't see any benefit).


Problem reports:
Unsubscribe info:

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]