This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: newlib and long-double question
On 4/10/2011 4:28 AM, Sisyphus wrote:
I never did see a clear description of OP's goals. "Performance" was
among them, so it was unclear why typical mathlinline.h content would
have been rejected e.g.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Hugh Myers"
The OP is trying to build Perl itself, not use it; hence the need for
long double support functions...
You don't need "long double support functions" to build perl ... unless
you want to build a perl whose NV is a long double (instead of a double).
Presumably the op wants to build a perl whose NV is a long double so
that he can make use of that extra precision. Given that he can't build
such a perl, the next best way of accessing that extra precision he
wants is, imo, to use Math::MPFR.
__inline_mathcode_ (long double, __sqrtl, __x, return __builtin_sqrtl (__x))
As OP indicated, the functions might not have been difficult to write,
perhaps not as difficult as settling requirements. If the requirement
was for sqrtl to perform faster than sqrt, the expectation was misguided.
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple