This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: BUG: Ability to access nonexistent directories
- From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 20:00:22 +0200
- Subject: Re: BUG: Ability to access nonexistent directories
- References: <000201ce52c4$891b04c0$9b510e40$%fedin at samsung dot com> <20130517083612 dot GE21752 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <000d01ce52dc$74e54bb0$5eafe310$%fedin at samsung dot com> <20130517102655 dot GG21752 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <20130517145612 dot GC7087 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx> <20130517152206 dot GL21752 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <20130517174857 dot GB660 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On May 17 13:48, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 05:22:06PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On May 17 10:56, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:26:55PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> >On May 17 12:56, Fedin Pavel wrote:
> >> >> Hello!
> >> >>
> >> >> > The reason for this behaviour has been outlined a couple of times on
> >> >> > this list. See http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-01/msg00173.html,
> >> >> > for instance.
> >> >>
> >> >> Heh...
> >> >> So, complete emulation would cost a major performance drop, right ?
> >> >> Well... Can there be any setting which enables these checks ? At least we have one use case...
> >> >
> >> >Not without lots of new code.
> >> So, maybe next Thursday?
> >I would love to, but unfortunately I have to brush my cat on Thursday.
> >And I don't even have a cat.
> You're welcome to brush mine in that case. I don't have one either.
> So it sounds like we may have a feline inavailability deadlock.
Is that ENOFEL or EFLOCK?
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple