This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: vim-7.3.1152-1
- From: Frank Fesevur <ffes at users dot sourceforge dot net>
- To: "cygwin at cygwin dot com" <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 12:09:22 +0100
- Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: vim-7.3.1152-1
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <announce dot 51B65778 dot 8020200 at users dot sourceforge dot net> <52096B42 dot 8010702 at Kautler dot net> <CAKChYSpP=AKMOc7yHL9NMJyQeKEvsswgKFTyJVKZZrg5vqbPsQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAKChYSpBEmXquHxkC2LZSmgH60kXfTxriDVX_Ap6HC4GNMRWMg at mail dot gmail dot com> <20131206171721 dot GA7240 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx> <CAKChYSqyXHXUh1GVNsOEZWPbS=RsObb_gOCLX5kycMFWej-mwQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <20131206234833 dot GC3154 at phoenix> <CAKChYSrNhmza5TBZNQQnaAC2LKJz7G1MbJi-+1K97c=Z0h9CJQ at mail dot gmail dot com>
2013/12/7 Björn Kautler:
> And it is ok and accepted that such a patch breaks the functionality?
Apparently that depends on the maintainer.
One maintainer does his best not to break existing installations:
And another introduces a new version
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-05/msg00163.html that breaks existing
installations (see last line of announcement: removed alternatives)
leaving people wonder why their vim doesn't work as expected (search
the archives back in May and June).
So cgf was right: http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#WJM
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple