Re: Default manifest

[Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin at cygwin dot com>]

On May 15 01:25, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 08:07:26PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
> >Are we close to a resolution of the problems with default manifests?  It 
> >looks to me like all the pieces are in place, but maybe I've missed 
> >something:
> >
> >   https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01387.html
> >   https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16790#c9
> >   https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16807#c8
> >
> >I'm not trying to rush any maintainers, but I'm asking because I 
> >currently have to use a self-built version of binutils, which doesn't 
> >provide a default manifest, because of the problem I reported here:
> >
> >   http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-04/msg00199.html
> 
> I'll update binutils ASAP.

For the default manifest to get going we also need the patcha new GCC
with Nick's patch from

  https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01378.html

Is that easily backportable to GCC 4.8, or does 4.8 not support the
%if-exists functionality?


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

Attachment: pgp2Vp42VZyzt.pgp
Description: PGP signature