This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Problem with new acl code and cdrtools
- From: Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa dot com>
- To: The Cygwin Mailing List <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 01:46:32 -0700
- Subject: Re: Problem with new acl code and cdrtools
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAFo71_4fDB3WkhXTL7eybNzKh2idVF1UHb7oJjaxFshcS9BFUg at mail dot gmail dot com> <20160208131835 dot GC12975 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <CAFo71_5=KT=kJY-wz0EZWZ_LBriCjX2s6=5PSVhHRSxx-A92qg at mail dot gmail dot com> <56B8C25F dot 7050206 at lysator dot liu dot se> <CAFo71_4eQ2VMypAnC=Bx_bvbzGvVCs=jj4r9Ax6GDbgaH1zGOQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CA0C06F1-A50D-4DBF-AB58-AADCE3D9F9F4 at etr-usa dot com> <CAFo71_58PFDgaNU4-bdj4JoCndXAd=+i57w_eAgeq==RVcyoDw at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Feb 9, 2016, at 12:56 AM, Ismail Donmez <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:14 AM, Warren Young <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On Feb 8, 2016, at 9:59 AM, Ismail Donmez <email@example.com> wrote:
>>> Thats a hack :)
>> Peterâs proposal is as far from a hack as it gets.
> What Peter suggests is telling autoconf to assume aclfromtext() does
> not exist on the system which is a hack and I already have a hack I
> could use.
No. Once again, heâs suggesting that you write a *test* that checks whether aclfromtext() exists here. Hypothesis -> test -> decision is science, not assumption or hackery.
>> #include <config.h>
>> #if HAVE_FUNC_ACLFROMTEXT
>> # include <cygwin/acl.h>
> I could check for __cygwin__ instead of that which would do the same thing.
Not if itâs Cygwin 1.7.34.
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple