Re: CVS version 32 vs 64-bit

[Marco Atzeri <marco dot atzeri at gmail dot com>]

On 11/07/2016 21:24, Vince Rice wrote:
> > On Jul 11, 2016, at 1:17 PM, Marco Atzeri <marco.atzeri@gmail.com
> > <mailto:marco.atzeri@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > On 11/07/2016 18:40, Vince Rice wrote:
> > > Is there a reason there’s a different version of cvs in 32-bit vs
> > > 64-bit Cygwin?
> > >
> > > 32-bit shows 1.12.13-10.
> > > 64-bit shows 1.11.23.
> > >
> > > (Yes, I know, git forever, but not everyone got the memo.)
> > > --
> >
> > https://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2015-07/msg00054.html
> >
> > 1.11.23-2 is the last version for both arch
> >
> > Regards
> > Marco
>
> Hmmm. Then I wonder how this is true.

The available one from setup are

	cvs-1.11.22-1
	cvs-1.11.23-2	

https://cygwin.com/packages/x86/cvs/

As I wrote in the ADVICE the upgrade
from 1.12.13-10 to cvs-1.11.23-2 can only
be managed manually, as setup is considering the
1.12.13-10 version higher than 1.11.23-2.
This unusual upgrade is not managed by the current logic in setup.
It was in the past but it created other upgrade problems.

Regards
Marco








--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple