This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Cygwin X11 Server slow performance
- From: Paul Sheer <paulsheer at gmail dot com>
- To: L A Walsh <cygwin at tlinx dot org>
- Cc: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 09:50:07 -0500
- Subject: Re: Cygwin X11 Server slow performance
- References: <CABxOuY8egyTzYbXGaTeyjt0AC=Wh5KQncmu3tj35KDk4k6hENw@mail.gmail.com> <CABxOuY-FqQcjaUBRKc3s2LoRHOPOUTYEh_iOSTh85EquJiGLYw@mail.gmail.com> <5d579671-213c-c742-05b2-b771a827b6f5@cygwin.com> <CABxOuY8ep65KrDQX4X4S5em=W4hS4F_86GzcWAOVD7hr2aMx-Q@mail.gmail.com> <5B15D849.60308@tlinx.org>
> Maybe you aren't familiar with 'X'. X is just a graphical
> transport. It doesn't have menus unless some other program puts them up.
> Try 'X' on linux -- running it from startX from a console and see
> how easy it is to use.
>
NetSarang commercial X server has configuration menus to set keyboard
mappings, cut-paste behavior, and various other settings in a user
friendly manner. It has orders of magnitude faster performance in a
side-by-side comparison using XEmacs Motif as a test application
displayed remotely over a 1GB LAN.
But that fact that you are using the reason "X is just a graphical
transport" as an excuse makes me realize it is impossible to have a
conversation with you.
Paul
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple