This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Feb 23 21:24, Ken Brown wrote: > On 2/23/2019 4:01 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Feb 23 20:48, Ken Brown wrote: > >> On 2/23/2019 2:15 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >>> Below's the NSSTC I used to test my timerfd implementation (based on > >>> another STC to show a problem in POSIX timers). From what I can tell it > >>> works as desired. If you find a problem, please point it out or send a > >>> patch. > >> > >> Thanks, that saved me a lot of time. I was in the process of creating a test > >> case when your mail arrived. > >> > >> Your test works fine. For example: > >> > >> $ gcc timerfd_test.c -o timerfd_test > >> > >> $ ./timerfd_test.exe 3 1 10 > >> 0.000: timer started 52379 > >> 2.988: 52379 read: 1; total=1 > >> 3.988: 52379 read: 1; total=2 > >> 4.989: 52379 read: 1; total=3 > >> 5.987: 52379 read: 1; total=4 > >> 7.001: 52379 read: 1; total=5 > >> 7.987: 52379 read: 1; total=6 > >> 9.001: 52379 read: 1; total=7 > >> 9.987: 52379 read: 1; total=8 > >> 10.987: 52379 read: 1; total=9 > >> 11.997: 52379 read: 1; total=10 > >> > >> But if I change CLOCK_MONOTONIC by CLOCK_REALTIME in the call to timerfd_create, > >> then I get the following: > > > > Only in timerfd_create? Not in clock_gettime? If you don't > > do that, you're using a different clock with entirely different > > values for the starttime. > > > > Actually, this testcase started with CLOCK_REALTIME in both calls. > > If I revert to that, I get: > > > > )$ ./timerfd 3 1 10 > > 0.000: timer started 644 > > 3.001: 644 read: 1; total=1 > > 4.001: 644 read: 1; total=2 > > 5.017: 644 read: 1; total=3 > > 6.001: 644 read: 1; total=4 > > 7.001: 644 read: 1; total=5 > > 8.009: 644 read: 1; total=6 > > 9.002: 644 read: 1; total=7 > > 10.001: 644 read: 1; total=8 > > 11.010: 644 read: 1; total=9 > > 12.017: 644 read: 1; total=10 > > > > I tested this STC with differnt clocks, but it's important to > > use the same cloack for clock_gettime and timerfd_create. > > Yes, that was careless of me. I now get the same results as you. I'll have to > go back to the emacs sources and see what else might be different there. You're right, nevertheless. Select on timerfd returns immediately. I (hope I) fixed that in git and uploaded new developer snapshots to https://cygwin.com/snapshots/ Please try especially with emacs. If that works as desired, I release 3.0.2 pretty soon. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Maintainer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |