Re: pipe broken by WSL?

[Thomas Wolff <towo at towo dot net>]

Hello Andrey,

Am 03.05.2019 um 20:52 schrieb Andrey Repin:
> Greetings, Eliot Moss!
>
> > On 5/2/2019 11:37 AM, Stephen Carrier wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 11:20:59AM +0200, Thomas Wolff wrote:
> > > > Calling WSL seems to break pipe processing:
> > > >
> > > > (echo 1; echo 2) |
> > > > while read line
> > > > do
> > > >     echo $line
> > > >     wsl uname
> > > > done
> > > I don't know about wsl, but could it be absorbing the standard input?
> > > What if "wsl uname" is replaced with "wsl uname < /dev/null" ?
> > You seem to be right; when I add < /dev/null as described, I get the expected output.
> Why not just
>
>      wsl uname <&-
>
> I wonder?
That gives me an error "Invalid handle", or, using `head` instead of 
`wsl`: head: failed to reopen 'stdin' with mode 'rb': Bad file descriptor.
By the way, a funny variant of the test case is

(echo 1; echo 2) |
while read line
do
   echo $line
   head -1
done
(Add an 'x' marker to the echo to watch the intricacies...)


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple