This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Is our use of Cygwin to build & run OpenOCD a good one?
- From: Jose Isaias Cabrera <jicman at outlook dot com>
- To: Erik Soderquist <erik dot soderquist at gmail dot com>, cygwin <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 14:27:28 +0000
- Subject: Re: Is our use of Cygwin to build & run OpenOCD a good one?
- References: <ad7a93aa-d688-d177-bdf2-d368f2acbbd0@mindchasers.com>,<CACoZoo1Q=DyY0i-SFHjGmU8BeJgGCkTEfkYXJ32QGF63BxSoZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Erik Soderquist, on Monday, May 20, 2019 10:16 AM, wrote...
>On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 3:44 PM Bob Cochran wrote:
><snip>
>> "Cygwin? this is probably still functional, but now can be considered a
>> (pre)historic solution."
>
>The words of the ignorant, in my opinion. Cygwin has done an
>excellent job of maintaining currency and usefulness.
Indeed. I have been using cygwin since 1996-7. Can't remember the exact year, but it has been God-sent, and it has been in every Windows machine I have had control. Just my 0.02. Thanks.
josé
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple