Re: non-persistent storage?

[Ulli Horlacher <framstag at rus dot uni-stuttgart dot de>]

On Thu 2019-12-12 (21:59), Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] via cygwin wrote:

> If the temp file was created by mktemp and the name saved in an
> environmental variable, each bash shell could have its own file with not
> risk that an instance of bash would erase another instance's file.

I need the opposite: all processes must read and write the same data!
And the data must be gone when system shuts down or even if there is a
power failure.

-- 
Ullrich Horlacher              Server und Virtualisierung
Rechenzentrum TIK         
Universitaet Stuttgart         E-Mail: horlacher@tik.uni-stuttgart.de
Allmandring 30a                Tel:    ++49-711-68565868
70569 Stuttgart (Germany)      WWW:    http://www.tik.uni-stuttgart.de/
REF:<BYAPR09MB29010912EBAE9D8F0196D35E9B550@BYAPR09MB2901.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple