This is the mail archive of the cygwin mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: headache on build repeatibility: octave vs BLODA ?


On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 17:55:31 +0100
Marco Atzeriwrote:
>    libinterp/corefcn/file-io.cc-tst 
> ...............................fatal: caught signal Segmentation fault 
> -- stopping myself...
> /bin/sh: line 1:  3771 Segmentation fault      (core dumped) /bin/sh 
> ../run-octave --norc --silent --no-history -p 
> /cygdrive/d/cyg_pub/devel/octave/prova_311_510/octave-5.1.0-2.x86_64/build/test/mex 
> /cygdrive/d/cyg_pub/devel/octave/prova_311_510/octave-5.1.0-2.x86_64/src/octave-5.1.0/test/fntests.m 
> /cygdrive/d/cyg_pub/devel/octave/prova_311_510/octave-5.1.0-2.x86_64/src/octave-5.1.0/test
> make[3]: *** [Makefile:31176: check-local] Error 139

Does this occur when you execute
make check
in build directory?

In my environment, at least segmentation fault does not occur.
When I built octave, many of non-mandatory libraries were not
installed. This might affect.

Attached is the output of 'make check' in my environment.

Windows version: Windows 10 1909
Microsoft Windows [Version 10.0.18363.592]

Cygwin version:
CYGWIN_NT-10.0 3.1.3(0.340/5/3) 2020-01-25 12:20 x86_64 Cygwin
(The version which is applied a few patches not accepted yet.
 Should be very close to snapshot 2020-01-24.)

-- 
Takashi Yano <takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp>

Attachment: octave-test.txt
Description: Text document

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]