This is the mail archive of the
docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list .
abstract red in FO?
- To: docbook <docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org>
- Subject: DOCBOOK-APPS: abstract red in FO?
- From: Eric Richardson <eric at milagrosoft dot com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:49:52 -0700
- Organization: MilagroSoft Inc.
Hi
I have the following docbook source which seems to vaildate okay.
<article>
<title>Article Title</title>
<articleinfo>
<author>
<firstname>Eric</firstname>
<surname>Richardson</surname>
</author>
<copyright>
<year>2000</year><holder>MilagroSoft Inc.</holder>
</copyright>
</articleinfo>
<abstract>
<title>Abstract</title>
<para>This is the abstract</para>
</abstract>
</article>
The abstract section shows up in red in the PDF from FO. I remember from
reading this group that the red means something special when the output
of the process. The XHTML processes this nicely.
html/titlepage.xsl has a selector for abstract.
fo/titlepage.xsl has a selector for abstract.
excerpt from fo.
<fo:block color="red"><abstract><fo:block
color="red"><title>Abstract</title></fo:block>
Any help would be appreciated.
Also, is there a DOCTYPE for fo?
Eric :-)