This is the mail archive of the docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org mailing list .


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

abstract red in FO?


Hi
I have the following docbook source which seems to vaildate okay.
<article>
  <title>Article Title</title>

  <articleinfo>
    <author>
      <firstname>Eric</firstname>
      <surname>Richardson</surname>
    </author>
    <copyright>
      <year>2000</year><holder>MilagroSoft Inc.</holder>
    </copyright>
  </articleinfo>
  
  <abstract>
    <title>Abstract</title>

    <para>This is the abstract</para>
  </abstract>
</article>

The abstract section shows up in red in the PDF from FO. I remember from
reading this group that the red means something special when the output
of the process. The XHTML processes this nicely.

html/titlepage.xsl has a selector for abstract.
fo/titlepage.xsl has a selector for abstract.

excerpt from fo.
<fo:block color="red">&lt;abstract&gt;<fo:block
color="red">&lt;title&gt;Abstract&lt;/title&gt;</fo:block>

Any help would be appreciated.

Also, is there a DOCTYPE for fo?

Eric :-)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]