This is the mail archive of the
docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list .
Re: abstract red in FO?
- To: docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Subject: Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: abstract red in FO?
- From: Norman Walsh <ndw at nwalsh dot com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 18:14:40 -0500
- References: <3A88688F.5367A3F8@milagrosoft.com>
/ Eric Richardson <eric@milagrosoft.com> was heard to say:
| The abstract section shows up in red in the PDF from FO. I remember from
| reading this group that the red means something special when the output
| of the process. The XHTML processes this nicely.
Red means I screwed up. (Literally, it means that no template matched the
element and so the default template got fired. That's not supposed to
happen.)
I'll take a look.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | It is necessary to try to surpass
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | oneself always; this occupation
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | ought to last as long as
| life.--Christina, Queen of Sweden
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
"unsubscribe" in the body to: docbook-apps-request@lists.oasis-open.org