This is the mail archive of the
docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list .
Re: abstract red in FO?
- To: Eric Richardson <eric at milagrosoft dot com>
- Subject: Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: abstract red in FO?
- From: Norman Walsh <ndw at nwalsh dot com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 07:47:24 -0500
- Cc: docbook <docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org>
- References: <3A88688F.5367A3F8@milagrosoft.com>
/ Eric Richardson <eric@milagrosoft.com> was heard to say:
| Hi
| I have the following docbook source which seems to vaildate okay.
| <article>
| <title>Article Title</title>
[...]
| The abstract section shows up in red in the PDF from FO. I remember from
| reading this group that the red means something special when the output
| of the process. The XHTML processes this nicely.
|
| html/titlepage.xsl has a selector for abstract.
| fo/titlepage.xsl has a selector for abstract.
|
| excerpt from fo.
| <fo:block color="red"><abstract><fo:block
| color="red"><title>Abstract</title></fo:block>
|
| Any help would be appreciated.
Fixed. Sorry for the delay.
| Also, is there a DOCTYPE for fo?
Not really. It's hard to do because of the nature of inheritance in
properties.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Extinction, n. The raw material out of
http://nwalsh.com/ | which theology created the future
| state.--Ambrose Bierce
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
"unsubscribe" in the body to: docbook-apps-request@lists.oasis-open.org