This is the mail archive of the
docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list .
Re: Foilgroup nesting (slides.dtd)
- From: Norman Walsh <ndw at nwalsh dot com>
- To: Jan Fabry <cheezy at lumumba dot luc dot ac dot be>
- Cc: docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2003 16:10:50 -0500
- Subject: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Foilgroup nesting (slides.dtd)
- References: <1041091652.2292.16.camel@localhost.localdomain>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
/ Jan Fabry <cheezy@lumumba.luc.ac.be> was heard to say:
| I searched a bit on Google and in the message list archives, but could
| not find a discussion about this subject. Is there a reason why this is
| not allowed, or is it just something nobody thought about? I can imagine
| situations where nesting of foilgroups would be needed, so I suggest it
| would be allowed in the DTD.
Generally, I think of presentations as a series of slides, sometimes
divided into groups. Given that the "readers" only see the sequence of
slides, it's hard to imagine exactly how you could communicate greater
than a single level of hierarchy.
Be seeing you,
norm
- --
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | If we lived alone in a featureless
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | desert we should learn to place
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | the individual grains of sand in a
| moral or aesthetic
| hierarchy.--Michael Frayn
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQE+E1laOyltUcwYWjsRAv83AJ9AFWb68qVOHpMfJ96GOFDDPmK4zACgnYQG
EnzICl8ioGYNcRzIuba5bLs=
=RfTZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----