This is the mail archive of the
docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list .
Re: XHTML and chunking parameters
- From: Bob Stayton <bobs at sco dot com>
- To: Geoff Leach <gl at cs dot rmit dot edu dot au>
- Cc: docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 08:24:38 -0800
- Subject: Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: XHTML and chunking parameters
- References: <20030227.022254.570419290.gl@cs.rmit.edu.au>
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 02:22:54AM +1100, Geoff Leach wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm investigating DocBook slides with MathML and SVG for Computational
> Science and Engineering courseware (slides, notes). I've read previous
> discussions about Latex versus DocBook. I'm a longtime Latex user,
> looking into the new land ...
>
> XHTML is needed for MathML and SVG. I'm using Mozilla as my test
> browser. I'm still coming up several learning curves, XSL in
> particular.
>
> The slides stylesheets use write.chunk extensively, which uses
> chunker parameters declared in chunker.xsl:
>
> chunker.output.cdata-section-elements
> chunker.output.doctype-public
> chunker.output.doctype-system
> chunker.output.encoding
> chunker.output.indent
> chunker.output.media-type
> chunker.output.method
> chunker.output.omit-xml-declaration
> chunker.output.standalone
>
> The html2xhtml.xsl transformation modifies chunker.outout.method to
> 'xml' but does not change the other chunker parameters.
>
> The docbook/xsl/xhtmlhtml2xhtml.xsl transformation sets xsl:output as
> (reformatted for easy reading):
>
> <xsl:output method="xml"
> encoding="UTF-8"
> doctype-public="-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
> doctype-system="http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"/>
>
> and it these doctypes which get used- at least in my testing with
> Saxon 6.5.2. My understanding is that they are inherited by
> saxon:output which (I think) actually does the output (serialization?).
>
> Is there a reason for not modifying the other chunker parameters,
> and relying on xsl:output?
>
> It wouldnt be hard to set values for the chunker parameters in a
> customization layer. But is it more appropriate they get modified by
> html2xhtml (in both the DocBook and the slides stylesheets)?
>
> There's another reason I'm interested in the chunker parameters to
> do with validation but I'll pop that into another post ...
I agree. I went ahead and filed an RFE on SourceForge
for this (#693732).
Bob Stayton 400 Encinal Street
Publications Architect Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Technical Publications voice: (831) 427-7796
The SCO Group fax: (831) 429-1887
email: bobs at sco dot com