This is the mail archive of the
docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list .
Re: [docbook-apps] is docbook the right tool for the job?
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer at nic dot fr>
- To: Bob Stayton <bobs at sco dot com>
- Cc: Jason Lewis <jason at dickson dot st>, docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 09:52:13 +0200
- Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] is docbook the right tool for the job?
- Organization: NIC France
- References: <3F556433.4050900@dickson.st> <20030903080118.A27118@sco.com>
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 08:01:18AM -0700,
Bob Stayton <bobs@sco.com> wrote
a message of 37 lines which said:
> The other aspect is whether the tools will produce the
> quality of output your need. Keep in mind that
> there are other FO processors that do a better job
> than the free processors PassiveTeX and FOP.
You can produce PDF from DocBook without FO. I still use jade +
pdfjadetex, which does not require non-free tools (Java JRE) and works
better than PassiveTeX.
To unsubscribe from this list, send a post to docbook-apps-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org.