This is the mail archive of the
docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list .
Re: [docbook-apps] anyone have a windows-based publishing infrast ructure?
- From: Bob Stayton <bobs at sco dot com>
- To: Gisbert Amm <gia at webde-ag dot de>
- Cc: 'Bill Lawrence' <scribe at matrixplus dot com>,'docbook apps list' <docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org>
- Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 09:20:25 -0700
- Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] anyone have a windows-based publishing infrast ructure?
- References: <74ADFA8C453ED611A71E00508BBBA135D9F054@exchange1.cinetic.de>
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 04:03:17PM +0200, Gisbert Amm wrote:
> > The big drawback in the Windows world is that you'll get lots of folks
> > in the company asking for output as Word documents instead of PDF or
> > help. I haven't tried it yet, but I'm told that the XMLMind FO
> > processor does a pretty good job of converting FO to RTF. Most of the
> > other RTF converters (such as JFOR) don't really to a good enough job.
>
> The approach of Mark Pilgrim (http://www.diveintopython.org/about.html) uses
> the Python Win32 modules and Word itself as a COM object to produce real
> Word documents. It worked for me (well, a simple test document) but I've
> found it useless: There is no way back.
I followed this link, but it does not mention anything
about Word. It says the book was produced using the
DocBook XSL stylesheets, HTMLDoc, and w3m. Was there
something in the downloaded tool files that used Word?
--
Bob Stayton 400 Encinal Street
Publications Architect Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Technical Publications voice: (831) 427-7796
The SCO Group fax: (831) 429-1887
email: bobs@sco.com
To unsubscribe from this list, send a post to docbook-apps-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org.