Re: [docbook-apps] Simpler XHTML output

[Dave Pawson <davep at dpawson dot co dot uk>]

On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 19:08 +0200, Jirka Kosek wrote:

> (BTW: To be honest, I usualy even prefer HTML 4.01, because even with 
> XHTML 1.0 there are some practical browser problems if you want to use 
> it with other encodings than UTF-8. But I don't think that we should 
> delve into standards/quirks rendering modes in browsers in this forum.)
> 
> > How else might we move towards browsers that are standards compliant?
> 
> Who knows :-(
> But I'm sure that serving non-compliant content is not the right way to 
> move further, and serving XHTML 1.1 as text/html is not completely in 
> shape with standards so it moves us somewhere but surely not to place 
> which is more standards compliant.

OK. I *think* you assume we are generating content to be shown in 
a browser.

Rene, we have a choice. Generate more complex xhtml 1.1
or simpler 1.0 which *may* be sent to the browser without problems.

I would like XML, and content for a browser (even a non compliant
browser) at the same time,
so I'd suggest xhtml 1.0.



regards DaveP


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-help@lists.oasis-open.org