This is the mail archive of the
docbook@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list for the DocBook project.
Re: PDF graphics
- To: docbook at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: PDF graphics
- From: "Jens M. Felderhoff" <j dot m dot f at netcologne dot de>
- Date: 08 Mar 2000 21:14:12 +0100
- References: <00022015234002.04411@akula> <017001bf7bcc$ea01e200$691010ac@rosetta.zon> <t24sb3osnz.fsf@frida.osc.no> <00022118522200.00840@akula> <20000302155142.D9761@getsystems.com>
- Reply-To: docbook at lists dot oasis-open dot org
Angus Lees <gus@getsystems.com> writes:
> just fyi: apparently the TeX backends can find their own image formats..
>
> i changed (graphic-file) (for the print stylesheet) to:
[...]
> and left the extension off all my graphics. pdfjadetex now finds png
> or pdf, jadetex finds eps.
I applied your graphic-file redefinition to my local style
file. However, that doesn´t seem to work for me.
I created some graphic files (jpg, eps, and png). In my original
DocBook source file I had three <imagedata> elements within the
<imageobject> element, one for each image format (like in "The
Definitive Guide").
I realized that the first one (jpg) was used by JadeTeX, PDFJadeTeX,
and HTML. The eps file was not used at all.
Then I applied your suggested graphic-file patch and just left one
<imagedata> element without extension and format attribute. Now all I
get are the captions.
Is there a FAQ around that describes what kind of image format to use
with what backend?
Cheers
Jens
--
Jens M. Felderhoff
home : j.m.f@netcologne.de
office: jmfelder@baan.com