This is the mail archive of the
docbook@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list for the DocBook project.
Re: [ #440667 ] Affiliation lacks CorpName
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw at nwalsh dot com>
- Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: [ #440667 ] Affiliation lacks CorpName
- From: Yann Dirson <ydirson at alcove dot fr>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 10:50:05 +0200
- Cc: docbook at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- List-Id: <docbook.lists.oasis-open.org>
- References: <87k7yo2y4f.fsf@nwalsh.com>
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 03:21:36PM -0400, Norman Walsh wrote:
> In
>
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=440667&group_id=21935&atid=384107
>
> Yann Dirson notes that affiliation contains orgname and orgdiv but no
> corpname. He goes on to point out that orgname is likely intended to
> be used for the orgname here.
I'm not sure to understand all of your statement, but I think my point
could be summarized as "is there a reason to have both corpname and
orgname existing in the DTD".
As Gregory points out, there is no <corpdiv>, while there is an
<orgdiv>. And <corpname> seems to occur in less places than <orgname>.
I see 2 possible actions:
- add a <corpdiv> element, and allow corp* where org* are allowed,
maybe in the following fashion (here, for affilition):
(shortaffil?,
jobtitle*,
((orgname,orgdiv*)|
(corpname,corpdiv*))?,
address*)
- drop <corpname> and tell people to use <orgname> instead. Well,
maybe a more generic name should be used instead of orgname.
--
Yann Dirson <Yann.Dirson@fr.alcove.com> http://www.alcove.com/
Free-Software Engineer Ingénieur Logiciel-Libre
Free-Software time manager Responsable du temps Informatique-Libre
----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>