This is the mail archive of the docbook@lists.oasis-open.org mailing list for the DocBook project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: another markup question -- multi-level exercises


On Fri, 26 Jul 2002, Robert McIlvride wrote:

> Hi Robert,
> 
> It works that automatically, at least for us.  For example, this markup:
> 
> <orderedlist>
>   <listitem>
>     <para>Ordered list item 1.</para>
>   </listitem>
>   <listitem>
>     <para>Beginning of sub-list 2.</para>
>     <orderedlist>
>       <listitem>
>         <para>Ordered list item 2a.</para>
>       </listitem>
>       <listitem>
>         <para>Ordered list item 2b.</para>
>       </listitem>
>     </orderedlist>
>     </listitem>
>     <listitem>
>       <para>Ordered list item 3.</para>
>     </listitem>
> </orderedlist>
> 
> Gives us this result:
> 
>    1.Ordered list item 1.
> 
>    2.Beginning of sub-list 2.
> 
>          a.Ordered list item 2a.
> 
>          b.Ordered list item 2b.
> 
>    3.Ordered list item 3.

as it is, i just verified that, but it's not clear from the
"docbook: tdg" book that this is what would happen.  the synopsis
table claims that numeration for an orderedlist is "none", yet
on the next page, it states that if numeration is not specified,
arabic numerals are used.

and there is no mention of the default numeration for sublists.
is there another part of the book i should have been looking at?
just being typically confused.

rday

Robert P. J. Day, RHCE, RHCI
Eno River Technologies, Chapel Hill NC
Unix, Linux and Open Source corporate training

http://www.linux-migration.org


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]