This is the mail archive of the docbook@lists.oasis-open.org mailing list for the DocBook project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Am I using DocBook appropriately?

From: Joachim Ziegler <ziegler at mpi-sb dot mpg dot de>
To: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif at pinkjuice dot com>
Cc: docbook at lists dot oasis-open dot org
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 15:23:11 +0100
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: Am I using DocBook appropriately?
References: <3E3B9D0C.8010603@pinkjuice.com><200302021348.h12DmvHk027431@ohsmtp02.ogw.rr.com><3E3D5BD1.9020803@pinkjuice.com>

Tobias Reif wrote:

I think numbered sections (like sect1) aren't as common now as
they once were, with nested sections being used more, but that's
just an impression I have.  I don't know how accurate it is.



I see; I could simply use section elements and none of sect[1-5].

That's news to me, too. I wonder when and why I should use sect1-sect5 at all. (?)

Greetings,
Joachim

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Am I using DocBook appropriately?
  - From: Jeff Biss
- Re: Am I using DocBook appropriately?
  - From: Norman Walsh

References:
- Am I using DocBook appropriately?
  - From: Tobias Reif
- Re: Am I using DocBook appropriately?
  - From: John R. Daily
- Re: Am I using DocBook appropriately?
  - From: Tobias Reif

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]